Compare

Sandbox providers compared

A capability-by-capability view of eleven sandbox providers and Sandbox as a Service. Competitor cells reproduce the verdicts in the cited research; our column is limited to what this repository verifies.

Capability summary

Every yes or no in a competitor cell links to the fetched source URL used for that verdict. A question mark means the capability was not found on the fetched pages, not that it is absent.

CapabilityE2BDaytonaModalVercel SandboxFly.io MachinesCodeSandbox SDKCloudflare SandboxNorthflankRunloopBlaxelMorph CloudSandbox as a Service
Python SDK on a registryyesyesyesyes????yesyesyesyes
TypeScript SDKyesyesyesyes?yesyesyesyesyesyesyes
REST/OpenAPIyesyes?yesyesyes?yesyesyesyesyes
CLIyesyesyesyesyes??yesyesyesyesno
Streaming exec outputyesyesyesyes??yes??yes?yes
Pause/resumeyesyes?yesyesyes??yesyesyesno
Snapshotsyesyesyesyes?yes?yesyesyesyesyes
Custom templates/imagesyesyesyesyesyesyes?yesyesyesyesno
Preview URLs/exposed portsyesyesyesyes??yesyesyesyesyesyes
GPUnoyesyes????yesyes??no
Published cold-start/startup claim?yesyesyesyesyes?yesyesyesyesyes
Isolation technologyyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Per-second pricingyesyesyes?yes?yesyesyesyes?yes
Free credit/tieryesyesyesyesyes?noyesyesyesyesyes
MCP serveryesyes?yes????yesyes?yes
llms.txtyesyes?yes??yesyesyesyes?yes

Sources fetched 2026-09-15; ? means not found on the fetched pages, not absent.

Sandbox as a Service claims are based on the API contract, implementation, Python SDK, MCP server, llms.txt handler, and configuration in this repository.